by Agence France-Presse. PARIS — Fishing nations opted Saturday to leave catch limits for eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna virtually unchanged despite concerns that the species is perilously close to collapse. Annual quotas for the sushi mainstay will be trimmed from 13,500 tons this year to 12,900 tons in 2011, the 48-member International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) decided at the close of a 10-day meeting in Paris. Some nations here favored a much lower cap, or even a suspension of fishing, to ensure bluefin’s long-term viability. But industry representatives and the governments that back them insisted the new catch limits were sufficient. “They will make it possible to reach maximum sustainable yield by 2022, which represents a balance between respecting natural resources and preserving the social-economic fabric,” said Bruno Le Maire, France’s agriculture and fisheries minister, in a statement. ICCAT scientists calculate that the new catch levels will put eastern Atlantic bluefin on track for a 70 percent chance of reaching sustainability by that date. The same scientists, however, caution that the data upon which these estimates are based is spotty at best, while conservationists counter that a 30 percent risk of failure is too high. The head of the Japanese delegation, Masanori Miyahara, told AFP he was satisfied with the outcome, but said stronger compliance measures were needed. “The actual catch level will be around 11,000, which is a large reduction off current levels,” he added, noting that some members had pledged not to use up their quotas. Japan is the world’s top consumer of bluefin, buying up more than 80 percent of all the fish taken from the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic. The United States, which had pushed for a sharper reduction, expressed disappointment. “I can’t say that we acted in as precautionary a manner as I would have liked,” said Russell Smith, a Department of Commerce official and head of the U.S. delegation. Currently, eastern Atlantic bluefin are at 85 percent of historical levels and 30 percent of “maximum sustainable yield,” the target for recovery. Green groups reacted angrily. “This outcome confirms that the bluefin’s days are numbered and has demonstrated ICCAT’s inability to act on its own mandate,” said Greenpeace International oceans campaigner Oliver Knowles. “The word ‘conservation’ should be removed from ICCAT’s name.”

More on SKCEA.org:

• Newest anti-Keystone activists: Tea Partiers
  By Jess...
• How the boom in climbing, biking and sailing is costing the earth
  In the first of a two-part sport and environment special, Isabella Kaminski reports on how habitat damage, waste, nanotechnology and persistent organic pollutants are increasingly linked to our favourite outdoor pursuits. ...
• Nanoparticles in your food? You’re already eating them
  I’ve been keeping my eye on the role of nanotechnology in food for a few years now, so I was interested to see a feature-length investigation called “Eating Nano” in this month’s E Magazine . In it, E editor Brita Belli takes a deep dive into the growing role of nanotechno...
• Meet the worst Senate amendment that ever lived
  By Sarah...
• Carbon Tax? Australians want snap election to voice their opinions
  Two thirds of Australians want a snap election on the government's controversial plan to tax carbon pollution, a poll showed on Wednesday, as Prime Minister Julia Gillard crosses the nation in a campaign-style blitz to sell the scheme. The plan will be put to the vote in parliame...