by Agence France-Presse. PARIS — The first six months of 2010 brought a string of warmest-ever global temperatures, but connecting these dots to long-term climate change patterns remains frustratingly difficult, experts say. Not only was last month the hottest June ever recorded, it was the fourth consecutive month in which the standing high mark was topped, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Indeed, 2010 has already surpassed 1998 for the most record-breaking months in a calendar year. As a block, the January-to-June period registered the warmest combined global land and ocean surface temperatures since 1880, when reliable temperature readings began, NOAA said. Arctic ice cover — another critical yardstick of global warming — had also retreated more than ever before by July 1, putting it on track to shrink beyond its smallest area to date, in 2007. On the face of it, these numbers would seem to be alarming confirmation of climate models that put Earth on a path towards potentially catastrophic impacts. Without steep cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions, the global thermometer could rise by 10.8 degrees F compared to pre-industrial levels, making large swathes of the planet unlivable, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has warned. Voluntary national pledges made after the Copenhagen climate summit in December would likely cap that increase at 6.3 F to 7.2 F, still fall far short of the 3.6 F limit that most scientists agree is the threshold for dangerous warming. But making a direct link between year-on-year variations in the weather and changes in climate — best measured in centuries — is simply not possible, scientists say. “When we are looking at the scale of a season or a few months, we can’t talk about trends related to climate change,” Herve Le Treut, head of France’s Laboratory of Dynamical Meteorology, said by phone. “The problem is knowing whether these numbers fit into a long-term evolution, and that only becomes apparent over at least two or three decades,” he said. For scientists, he said, it would be like trying to figure out which way the tide is moving by watching only a few waves lapping at the shoreline. A hotter-than-average 2010 is due at least in part to the influence of periodic El Ni

More on SKCEA.org:

• Clouds Don’t Cause Climate Change, Study Shows
  ScienceDaily (Sep. 6, 2011) — Clouds only amplify climate change, says a Texas A&M University professor in a study that rebuts recent claims that clouds are actually the root cause of climate change. ...
• Louisiana’s new oil plague sounds tasty, is terrifying
  by Jess Zimmerman. Remember tar balls? Those were just an appetizer. The scary new oil formations washing up on Louisiana’s beaches sound like you’d get them at Whole Foods -- “emulsified oil,” “oil mousse.” Um, yum? This comes right on the he...
• Hearing on overturning NY fracking ban draws huge turnout
  The final hearings on regulations that would end a ban on drilling for natural gas in New York state got under way on Tuesday in a packed auditorium at Sullivan County Community College. In a last chance for communities to voice their views for and against a controversial drillin...
• Dam About to Bust on Clean Hydrokinetic Energy
  A company called Verdant Power has won the first ever commercial license for a hydrokinetic tidal power facility in the U.S., and that could be just the first drop in a torrent of more than 100 new hydrokinetic projects that are still in the initial stages of permitting around th...
• Wheat Poised to Weather Climate Change
  With climate change predicted to alter precipitation and raise temperatures in North American grain-growing regions by 3 to 4 degrees Celsius (about 5 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century, crops in the future will face dramatically different growing conditions than ...