Posted by admin on 03 28th, 2011 | no responses

Obama tells government to prepare for climate change, whether Congress likes it or not

by Jess Zimmerman. Congress may dither and dig in their heels about whether global climate change is even a real thing , let alone an emergency that must be prepared for. But soon all Federal agencies — not to mention a lot of private businesses that deal with the government — will be implementing plans for adapting to climate change, due to Obama's executive order 13514 . That order was signed in 2009, but you probably haven't heard anything about it. Since it was an executive order, there was no arguing or filibustering or petitions or whatever. It just quietly went into effect, and then this month the president's Council on Environmental Quality issued instructions for implementation. Agencies will be required to set emissions reduction goals, appoint a climate adaptation specialist, and plan to increase energy efficiency and reduce petroleum, waste, and water usage. (And yeah, it did pretty much take since 2009 for CEQ to come up with its instructions for how to proceed. Imagine how much longer it would have taken with congressional action.) Executive orders have a stink on them. During the Bush years they basically became interchangeable with “doing an end run around checks and balances for nefarious purposes.” Which … okay, they are sort of that. But is that more palatable to lefties when it's Obama trying to dodge an obstructionist Congress instead of Bush … being Bush? If so, surprise! A presidentially-mandated climate change adaptation plan was Bush's idea. He signed an executive order in 2007 that forced federal agencies to become more sustainable. Obama just strengthened and expanded that plan. Bet the House GOP's knickers are still in a twist about it, though.

See the article here:
Obama tells government to prepare for climate change, whether Congress likes it or not

More on SKCEA.org:

  • How the boom in climbing, biking and sailing is costing the earth
    In the first of a two-part sport and environment special, Isabella Kaminski reports on how habitat damage, waste, nanotechnology and persistent organic pollutants are increasingly linked to our favourite outdoor pursuits. ...
  • Amtrak may start allowing pets to ride with you
    Robb Wilson Amtrak fans in the House of Representatives have finally stumbled onto that age-old marketing principle: “If you want people to use a service, fill it with animals.” (I assume that’s what they teach in marketing school, and if they don’t they ...
  • Infographic: How many jobs would solar create?
    by Jess Zimmerman. Stronger solar policies could create over 100,000 jobs in just a few years, according to ...
  • Why no one said the c-word in the debates
    Reuters / Mike Segar “I’m disappointed. I was surprised it wasn’t mentioned at all.” Speaking from his hotel room in Washington, D.C., after the third presidential debate last night, Bob Inglis — the former South Carolina Republican representative, and now conservative adv...
  • Ask Umbra: Which cutting board is best, wood or plastic?
    Send your question to Umbra! Q. Dear Umbra, I’m moving this summer and we have tons of cutting boards! I might get rid of a few. Are any of the especially old ones (25+ years old) hazardous to my health? Especially the ones I’ve used to cut meat? And which is the more sustainabl...

Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word