Posted by admin on 04 18th, 2011 | no responses

Supreme Court set to weigh in on whether we can hold companies responsible for climate change

by Jess Zimmerman. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court is set to rule on American Electric Power vs. Connecticut, a case where the state of Connecticut is suing a power company for contributing to global warming. Trying to research the legal details of this case is making me cry, so I hope you people appreciate the following bullet points, which will hopefully spare you having to do the same: At issue, big picture: Can states and private entities sue utilities for contributing to climate change? At issue, smaller pictures: Do states and private entities have a leg to stand on when complaining about climate change? (We'd say yes, but we're hardly lawyers, see above.) Should this be handled under federal common law, or by states? If it is the provenance of federal common law, is this the right part of federal law to sue under? (Supreme Court cases tend to be painfully specific.) Also, “whether claims seeking to cap carbon dioxide emissions based on a court's weighing of the potential risks of climate change against the socioeconomic utility of defendants' conduct would be governed by 'judicially discoverable and manageable standards' or could be resolved without 'initial policy determination[s] of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion,'” which, Jesus. No idea what that means. Oh wait, I think it means “whether this should be something you can even sue over, or something that needs to be settled outside the court.” But you see what I mean about the language. This is one to watch for a couple of reasons: First, enviros want to maintain the ability to go after utilities legally, instead of waiting around for legislation to get enacted, for obvious reasons. Also, this is going to be a close one: Because Sonia Sotomayor was sitting on the Second Circuit Court when the case was originally tried (and decided in favor of Connecticut, i.e. states do have standing to sue and can go ahead and do so), she's recused herself from this one. So it could come down to a split vote. In that case, the earlier decision would stand.

Read the original here:
Supreme Court set to weigh in on whether we can hold companies responsible for climate change

More on SKCEA.org:

  • Fungal disease threat seen increasing
    Fungal diseases are a major threat not just to wild plants and animals, but to us. A new Nature paper shows we're already heading for huge fungal damage to vital crops and ecosystems over the coming decades. If we don't do more to stop these diseases' spread, their impact could b...
  • ‘Mountain tsunamis’ are a thing; threaten Himalayas
    by Christopher Mims. The kingdom of Bhutan, famous for maximizing "Gross National Happiness" rather than GDP, is sitting under a gigantic time bomb of water that could burst at any moment, flooding its villages and putting a major damper on all that good cheer. Bhutan has 2,674 ...
  • Tar-sands pipeline gets support from fake Twitter accounts
    by Jess Zimmerman. What do Astroturf and the Canadian tar sands have in common? They're both made of petroleum, and now they've both got fake grassroots. An employee of the American Petroleum Institute, which supports the Keystone XL tar-sands pipeline, has apparently be...
  • In the News: Hawaiian monk seal sliding towards extinction in reserve
    Listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN, the Hawaiian monk seal was persecuted in the past for its meat, hide and oil, and its populations continue to decline as a result of human disturbance, low food availability and entanglement in marine debris. ...
  • In the News: World temperature records updated
    New data has been added to global temperature records, which now indicate that the world has warmed even more in the last decade than previously thought. ...

Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word