Posted by admin on 05 17th, 2011 | no responses

Why Germany had to phase out nuclear to build its renewables

by Christopher Mims. Lots of American journalists (including this one!) have gone on and on about renewables and nuclear power in Germany without having a first-hand appreciation of the situation, or even any German language ability. This has led us all to misapprehend some pretty basic facts about why the Germans decided to phase out their existing nuclear power plants, even if it means they’re burning more fossil fuels in the short term. (Granted, a big part of it was Fukushima.) Luckily a German popped over to Climate Progress to explain it all in the comments : …It turned out that [the Merkel government’s decision, before Fukushima, to extend the life of Germany’s existing nuclear power plants by 8-12 years] was very bad for alternative energy. many regional suppliers (”Stadtwerke”) had made investments into alternative energy, which were threatened by the longer running times. *** it is simply false to assume that if we keep nuclear energy, we would get more CO2-free electricity production. instead, nuclear power would block the development of alternatives! it was the clear timetable of a nuclear phase-out, together with feed in tarifes that were driving the growth of alternatives in Germany over the last decade! *** Basically what commenter “sod” is saying is that if Germany had kept around its nuclear power, it would have cut into the demand for new power sources — i.e. renewables. We have exactly the same problem in the U.S. right now, namely: why rip out our existing energy infrastructure and pay for a new one, especially when demand isn’t growing all that fast? Except, oh yeah: we should be tackling climate change. What Germany is doing isn’t without risk: in the short term, the country is building a bunch of coal-fired power plants that make absolutely no sense in light of its attempts to reduce its emissions. And the switch from coal / nuclear to natural gas-fired power plants , which are required as backup to intermittent wind and solar, makes them beholden to Russia, which has all the gas.

Here is the original post:
Why Germany had to phase out nuclear to build its renewables

More on SKCEA.org:

  • Google drops renewable energy program
    by Sarah Laskow. Google announced yesterday that it's trashing its Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal program, or or RE...
  • June 2010 Lunar Eclipse: When to Watch in U.S.
    A partial eclipse of the Strawberry Moon, June's full moon, is best viewed from Hawaii and the U.S. West Coast. This NASA lunar eclipse map has the details. Also see moon journaling and 10 more creative ways to get your kid to play outside ....
  • The Greening of NASCAR
    NASCAR, the National Association for Auto Stock Car Racing, the world's largest motor sports association, is trying to green its image. Under chairman and CEO, Brian France, NASCAR is seeking to become a true environmental leader. This may seem like a paradox for a sport where th...
  • The Rising Indian Ocean
    Changing sea levels have happened before and will happen again in a dynamic world. Newly detected rising sea levels in parts of the Indian Ocean, including the coastlines of the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea, Sri Lanka, Sumatra and Java, appear to be at least partly a result of ...
  • How climate change shows up in ancient, Tolkien-esque myths
    by Christopher Mims. The Vernagtferner glacier in the portion of the Alps falling within the borders of Austria is said to be cursed. In ancient legend, it buried the cities Onan...

Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word